Advocate General Athanasios Rantos has recommended that the ECJ reject the EU Commission’s appeals in the dispute over disclosure of Pfizer vaccine contracts. A second consecutive legal defeat is now in sight — and the text messages are gone anyway.
Four stations, one data point that remains unanchored between them.
26 August 2021 — UN Special Rapporteur on Torture Nils Melzer sends an official communication, file reference AL DEU 6/2021, to the German Federal Government. Trigger: numerous reports and video recordings of disproportionate police force against protesters at anti-Covid demonstrations in Berlin, particularly on August 1, 2021.1
Anyone entering this matter through the question “How can a rejected asylum seeker sit on the BR Broadcasting Council?” is already in the wrong frame. That frame has been delivered since September 2025 in dense frequency by a recognisable clickbait cluster — Apollo News, Tichys Einblick, Junge Freiheit, Politikversagen — and that frequency itself is the material on which the actual process is built. The actual process is a function inversion: a member of an oversight body, mandated by the Bavarian Broadcasting Act to safeguard plurality, has run a wave of criminal complaints since the late summer of 2025 against media plurality outside the public-broadcasting sector.
On 25 February 2026, the VII Civil Senate of Germany’s Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH), presided by Judge Pamp, with judges Halfmeier, Graßnack, Borris and Dr Hannamann, issued a decision that, in the broadcasters whose entire funding mechanics it directly affects, has to this day never been reported. Case number: VII ZB 29/24. Matter: enforcement by Bavarian Broadcasting (Bayerischer Rundfunk, BR) against an individual fee debtor in Allgäu over unpaid broadcasting fees. Outcome: the enforcement is declared inadmissible, the creditor — the BR — bears the costs. Both lower courts, the local court of Kaufbeuren and the 4th Civil Chamber of the regional court of Kempten, had ruled the opposite way. The Federal Court overturned them both.
Two months after the Berlin II Regional Court’s ruling against Correctiv, two versions of the same story are circulating. In one, a “painstakingly constructed edifice of lies” is collapsing, prizes must be returned, the democracy rallies were propaganda. In the other, Correctiv has won “a victory for press freedom” and the investigation stands.
Everyone is staring at the wrong thing.
Since the Epstein files dropped, public attention has locked onto the obvious — prominent names, sexual misconduct, a convicted pedophile with impossible connections. That story is real and it matters. But Prof. Roland Wiesendanger, physicist and nanoscientist at the University of Hamburg, spent his time in the documents looking somewhere else. And what he found is arguably bigger.
The ruling of the General Court of the European Union (EuG) of May 14, 2025 (case number T-36/23) marks a decisive blow against the EU Commission in the so-called “Pfizergate”. The case concerns the Commission’s refusal to disclose text messages (SMS) between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. The plaintiff, the New York Times (represented by journalist Matina Stevis-Gridneff), was vindicated: The Commission must re-examine the request and release the messages – if they exist. The ruling underscores the transparency obligation of EU institutions and sharply criticizes the Commission for inadequate documentation of digital communication.
On September 11, 2025, the GKV-Spitzenverband (National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds) filed a historic lawsuit against the Federal Republic of Germany. This lawsuit, considered one of the largest in German history, could have far-reaching implications for healthcare system financing. Here are the key details:
Introduction # Five years have passed since the world was plunged into the chaos of the Corona pandemic. While many believe the dust has settled, the truth is far from being fully uncovered. A recent discussion in the German Bundestag, titled “5 Years of Corona: Was It a Military Operation, and What Did Pfizer Know?”, shed light on some disturbing revelations. Let’s examine the key points and explore their implications.
Scientific Communication vs. Political Messaging # The “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” Discrepancy # On November 3, 2021, German Health Minister Jens Spahn publicly stated Germany was facing a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” However, internal RKI protocols from November 5, 2021, reveal significant institutional concerns:
