Structural Analysis on ELIZA on Steroids — Critical AI Analysis

Now Check Your Own Vaccination Status — Appeal from a Federal Agency That Kept No Protocols for Three Years

Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:53:18 +0000

On 24 April 2026, in the early afternoon, Germany’s Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) — the federal agency for vaccines and biomedical medicines — posts from its official X account @PEI_Germany a card marking the end of European Immunisation Week. On the card: a cartoon family — mother, child, teenager, adult, elderly woman, male nurse in headscarf. Above it, in friendly green, with an exclamation mark:

The Director's Name on the Line: How the German Federal Court Took Enforcement Away from the Public Broadcaster

Fri, 24 Apr 2026 13:28:55 +0000

On 25 February 2026, the VII Civil Senate of Germany’s Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH), presided by Judge Pamp, with judges Halfmeier, Graßnack, Borris and Dr Hannamann, issued a decision that, in the broadcasters whose entire funding mechanics it directly affects, has to this day never been reported. Case number: VII ZB 29/24. Matter: enforcement by Bavarian Broadcasting (Bayerischer Rundfunk, BR) against an individual fee debtor in Allgäu over unpaid broadcasting fees. Outcome: the enforcement is declared inadmissible, the creditor — the BR — bears the costs. Both lower courts, the local court of Kaufbeuren and the 4th Civil Chamber of the regional court of Kempten, had ruled the opposite way. The Federal Court overturned them both.

Understand, Don't Judge — and Break the Witness: The Müller Method in Germany's Covid Inquiry Commission

Fri, 24 Apr 2026 11:00:41 +0000

On April 23, 2026, the Bundestag Enquete Commission “Processing the Covid Pandemic and Lessons for Future Pandemic Events” convened in public session. Block subject: Critical Infrastructures (KRITIS) and the role of the Bundeswehr in pandemic situations. Expert witness: Stephan Kohn, former senior official at the Federal Interior Ministry (BMI), author of the 80-page internal evaluation of May 2020 that assessed the then-current Covid policy as a false alarm — a paper that has since served as a case study, depending on whom you ask, of either bureaucratic dissent or bureaucratic discipline.