Skip to main content
  1. Blog/

Marcus Aurelius and the Ranks of the Insane — Why Majorities Are Not a Compass

Essays - This article is part of a series.
Part : This Article

“The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.” — attributed to Marcus Aurelius

A note upfront: This quote does not appear in Marcus Aurelius’ Meditations. It has been attributed to him for decades on the internet — without evidence. Whether it came from him, from Seneca, or from no one famous: it does not matter. The thought is correct.


The Wrong Question
#

Most people ask the wrong question: Am I with the majority or against it?

This is a trap. Majorities are not a compass. They indicate which way the wind is currently blowing — not where north is. Anyone who aligns their thinking with whether they belong to the majority has stopped thinking for themselves. They measure themselves by heads, not by arguments.

The ancients knew this. Socrates was sentenced to death by the majority of Athens. Galileo was laughed at by the majority of scholars of his time. The majority is wrong — regularly, systematically, and often with great conviction.


The Actual Standard
#

Marcus Aurelius — or whoever coined this sentence — turns the question around. The point is not to be against the majority. The point is not to lose your mind.

This is a fundamental difference. Contrarianism for its own sake is just as stupid as conformity. Anyone who reflexively opposes everything the majority believes is just as unfree as the person who reflexively agrees. Both delegate their thinking — one inward to the herd, the other outward to the anti-herd.

Independent thinking means: examining arguments. Questioning sources. Being willing to be wrong. Being willing to be right — even when no one is listening.


What “Insane” Means Today
#

In 2022, author Margarete Stokowski was presented at a federal press conference to promote the COVID booster. She announced that she had fallen ill after the booster and was suffering from Long COVID. The event became a disaster — not because Stokowski lied, but because the message achieved the opposite effect.

This is not an isolated case. We live in a time when institutions burn through their credibility through overreach. Too much certainty on uncertain questions. Too much unanimity in complex debates. Too little tolerance for divergent data.

Anyone who believes everything that comes from above in this climate is not reasonable — they are credulous. Anyone who rejects everything that comes from above is not a critic — they are reactive. Both are forms of outsourcing your thinking.


The Goal
#

The sentence of the unknown Stoic is precise: Do not seek the majority. Avoid madness.

Madness here means: loss of contact with reality. It can sit on the right or on the left. In institutions or in resistance movements. In expert panels or in Telegram groups. Anyone who categorically absolves one side of losing touch with reality has already missed the point.

The ability to endure uncomfortable facts — even when they argue against your own side — is the only instrument that reliably leads out of the ranks of the insane.

This is not a comfortable position. It is the only tenable one.


Independent thinking is not a political position. It is the refusal to import one.

Essays - This article is part of a series.
Part : This Article

Related

Awake? Or Just Addicted to Telegram?

··783 words·4 mins
You share 47 WEF articles a day and call it resistance. Your Telegram channel has 5,000 members and not one of them can set up a server. That is not an awakening. That is digital methadone. # The Morning of an “Awakened” Person # 6:30 AM. Phone. Telegram. 127 new messages in 5 groups. Klaus Schwab said something. Bill Gates did something. Lauterbach lied about something. All decorated with red arrows and exclamation marks.