Skip to main content
  1. Blog/

One Funding Pool, Many Recipients: Omas gegen Rechts and the HateAid Network

··1034 words·5 mins
Media Criticism - This article is part of a series.
This Article

The Omas Are Not the Problem. The Omas Are the Friendly Face.
#


Who the Omas Are
#

“Omas gegen Rechts” (Grandmas Against the Right) is one of Germany’s most sympathetic political movements. Founded in 2017 in Vienna by Monika Salzer, and in Germany in 2018/2019 by Anna Ohnweiler from Nagold. Older women standing up against right-wing extremism. Knitted hats, placards, rallies in wind and rain.

In Germany: a registered association (OMAS GEGEN RECHTS DEUTSCHLAND E.V.) plus numerous loose regional groups.

Anna Ohnweiler says: “We confirm that we receive no institutional funding from tax revenues or foundations.”

That’s true — almost.

Not Charitable — and Proud of It
#

An important detail: the association OMAS GEGEN RECHTS DEUTSCHLAND e.V. is not recognized as a charitable organization — and has never applied for charitable status. This means: no donation receipts, no transparency requirements, no disclosure of finances.

On February 7, 2025, the association published a statement: “We are volunteers — no funding from public funds.”

What the federal government has to say about this is covered in the next section.


What the Federal Government Says
#

In August 2024, the federal government responded to an inquiry from AfD MP Bernd Schattner. The figures:

  • €18,000 from the federal program “Demokratie leben!” (Federal Family Ministry, Lisa Paus/Greens)
  • €5,000 from the Federal Chancellery (Integration Commissioner) — to the subgroup “Omas gegen Rechts Buxtehude”

€23,000 in taxpayer money. Not much. But it contradicts the claim of “no public funds.”

The Omas explain: the money went to regional groups, not the federal association. That may be organizationally accurate — but the money came from the state and went to groups operating under the same name.


What the Press Council Says
#

In 2025, WELT and BILD ran headlines: “Taxpayer Money for Street Protests” and “Government Money for Anti-Right Demos.” The Press Council reprimanded both in February 2026 — there was insufficient evidence for the claim that taxpayer money went directly to demonstrations.

The reprimand is valid: €23,000 through funding programs is not the same as “government finances protests.”

But the reprimand doesn’t change the fact: money from the state is money from the state. Whether it’s used for demos or for “project work” — it flows into an organization that acts politically.


The Same Funding Pool
#

“Demokratie leben!” is the central federal program for promoting democracy and combating extremism. Among the organizations funded from this pool:

OrganizationWhat It Does
Omas gegen RechtsDemos, rallies, “against the right”
HateAidDigital violence counseling, advocates for stricter laws
Amadeu Antonio FoundationMonitoring “right-wing” networks, reporting portals

Three organizations. One funding pool. The same political direction.


The Joint Appeal
#

In March 2025, four organizations published a joint online appeal: “Protection of Civil Society Must Be in the Coalition Agreement!” — 475,000 signatures.

The signatories:

  1. Campact
  2. foodwatch
  3. Amadeu Antonio Foundation
  4. Omas gegen Rechts

Campact is the same association that holds 33.32% of HateAid — the organization demanding mandatory real-name identification on the internet and that co-organized the Fernandes rally at the Brandenburg Gate. See our full HateAid investigation here.

The Omas sit at the table with Campact. Campact co-founded HateAid. HateAid demands real names online. The Omas probably don’t know this.


The CDU Inquiry
#

In February 2025, the CDU/CSU parliamentary group submitted 551 questions about the funding of civil society organizations. These included:

  • Omas gegen Rechts
  • Campact
  • Amadeu Antonio Foundation
  • BUND
  • Foodwatch
  • Netzwerk Recherche

17 organizations. All in the same political spectrum. The federal government defended the funding.

The inquiry was framed by media as an “attack on civil society.” Whether the 551 questions were justified, everyone can judge for themselves. That they had to be asked says something about transparency.


Amadeu Antonio Foundation: The Connector
#

The Amadeu Antonio Foundation appears everywhere:

  • Actively supports Omas gegen Rechts — covered them favorably, organized their first national congress in Erfurt (August 2025)
  • Is funded through “Demokratie leben!” — same funding pool as the Omas
  • Co-signed the joint appeal with Campact and the Omas
  • Was queried in the CDU/CSU 551-question inquiry

A foundation that is simultaneously funder, co-organizer, political ally, and co-signatory — in the same network, from the same pool.


What This Means — and What It Doesn’t
#

This article does not claim that Omas gegen Rechts is a controlled organization. Most Omas are exactly what they appear to be: engaged older women worried about democracy.

This article also does not claim that €23,000 in public money is a scandal. Compared to the millions flowing into other programs, it’s a rounding error.

What this article shows:

  1. The claim of “no public funds” is false — €23,000 is documented
  2. The Omas sit in the same network as Campact and HateAid — whether knowingly or not
  3. The same funding pool simultaneously finances Omas, HateAid, and Amadeu Antonio
  4. The joint appeal connects organizations with very different goals — from knitted hats to mandatory real-name identification

The Omas are the friendly faces. The question isn’t whether they’re honest. The question is: who sits behind the other faces at the same table?


Sources
#


The Omas knit. Campact plans. HateAid demands. Amadeu Antonio networks. And “Demokratie leben!” pays them all from the same pool. The Omas probably don’t know who sits at the other end of the table. Perhaps they should ask.

Media Criticism - This article is part of a series.
This Article

Related

Follow the Money: Who Funds HateAid — and Why It Matters

··1957 words·10 mins
A Former Nazi Family, Two Federal Ministries, a Campaign NGO, and a PR Consultant. The Network Behind the Organization Demanding Mandatory Real-Name Identification Online. # What HateAid Is # HateAid is a Berlin-based non-profit GmbH, founded in 2018. Official purpose: counseling and supporting victims of digital violence. 54 employees. 143 cease-and-desist letters and 49 civil lawsuits in 2024.

Trusted Flagger: How HateAid and Campact Compel Platforms to Censor

Since June 2025, HateAid holds a status that received almost no press coverage: EU Trusted Flagger under Article 22 of the Digital Services Act. What that means: platforms such as Meta, YouTube and X are legally required to process HateAid’s reports faster and with priority. Not as a courtesy — as a legal obligation.

Amadeu Antonio Foundation: Money, Intelligence, History — A Structural Analysis

Methodological note. This text is based on primary Bundestag documents (Drucksachen), the foundation register, the AAS website, and publicly available material on the founder’s Stasi-IM past. Where amounts are only secondary-sourced, this is marked. The foundation does work against right-wing extremism that addresses an unquestionable societal need. The point here is not to deny it its legitimacy — it is to show what the foundation systematically does not show when presenting itself as a “civil society” actor.

The Reporter, the Awards, the Money: What Stands Behind the Correctiv Investigation

Part 1 laid out the legal state of play: Three Sentences, Two Courts, No Final Judgment. What that piece could not do: describe the structure behind the investigation — the person, the awards, the money flows. These are not in the operative part of the Berlin ruling, but they explain why the investigation had such outsized impact.