<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Özge Inan on ELIZA on Steroids — Critical AI Analysis</title>
    <link>https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/tags/%C3%B6zge-inan/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Özge Inan on ELIZA on Steroids — Critical AI Analysis</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>© 2026 ElizaOnSteroids</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:50:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/tags/%C3%B6zge-inan/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>The Reporter, the Awards, the Money: What Stands Behind the Correctiv Investigation</title>
      <link>https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/posts/correctiv-reporter-awards-money/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:30:00 +0200</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/posts/correctiv-reporter-awards-money/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Part 1 laid out the legal state of play: &lt;a href=&#34;https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/posts/correctiv-potsdam-three-sentences-two-courts/&#34; &gt;Three Sentences, Two Courts, No Final Judgment&lt;/a&gt;. What that piece could not do: describe the structure behind the investigation — the person, the awards, the money flows. These are not in the operative part of the Berlin ruling, but they explain why the investigation had such outsized impact.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/posts/correctiv-reporter-awards-money/featured.png" />
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
