<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rapid on ELIZA on Steroids — Critical AI Analysis</title><link>https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/tags/rapid/</link><description>Recent content in Rapid on ELIZA on Steroids — Critical AI Analysis</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-US</language><copyright>© 2026 ElizaOnSteroids</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 05:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/tags/rapid/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Man Who Branded the Lab-Origin Debate a Conspiracy Theory Had 'Gain of Function' Written Into His Own Grant Application</title><link>https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/posts/drosten-conflict-of-interest-gof/</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 05:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/posts/drosten-conflict-of-interest-gof/</guid><description>Christian Drosten coordinated a publicly funded research consortium whose own application speaks verbatim of a &amp;lsquo;gain-of-function approach.&amp;rsquo; In the same spring of 2020 he co-signed the letter that publicly branded the debate over a lab origin a &amp;lsquo;conspiracy theory.&amp;rsquo; Both have been documented for years. Placed side by side, they amount to a conflict of interest that to this day is never named as one in Germany. A precise assessment — with every caveat that belongs to it.</description><media:content xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://elizaonsteroids.org/en/posts/drosten-conflict-of-interest-gof/featured.png"/></item></channel></rss>