Showcase: Investigative Analysis & Critical Research#

🏛️ Legal Analysis#

Van Kessel Lawsuit Analysis#

Deep Investigation →
Comprehensive analysis of the Dutch COVID vaccine lawsuit, examining legal strategies, procedural challenges, and the intersection of public health policy with individual rights.

Von der Leyen Investigations#

No-Confidence Motion Analysis →
Critical examination of EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen’s controversial decisions, transparency issues, and the political dynamics surrounding no-confidence motions.

🤖 AI Criticism & Technology Analysis#

ChatGPT Content Filtering Exposed#

Filter Mechanisms Investigation →
Detailed analysis of how ChatGPT filters content, revealing the hidden censorship mechanisms and their implications for information access.

OpenAI O1 Reasoning Critique#

Perfect Mind Control Analysis →
Critical examination of OpenAI’s O1 “reasoning” model, exposing the marketing hype versus actual capabilities and societal implications.

Deep Learning Illusion#

Technical Debunking →
Evidence-based analysis challenging the deep learning narrative, examining what these systems actually do versus marketing claims.

📰 Media Investigations#

RKI Files: Political Manipulation Exposed#

Document Analysis →
Investigation into leaked RKI documents revealing political influence on Germany’s COVID response and scientific independence.

Drosten Contradictions Analysis#

Critical Examination →
Systematic analysis of inconsistencies in Christian Drosten’s public statements and scientific positions during the pandemic.

🇪🇺 EU Politics & Regulatory Analysis#

EU AI Act: Bureaucracy Over Innovation#

Policy Critique →
Critical analysis of the EU AI Act, examining how regulatory theater often prioritizes control over actual innovation and consumer protection.

EU-US AI Safety Summit Analysis#

Regulatory Theater Investigation →
Behind-the-scenes look at international AI governance, revealing the gap between public safety rhetoric and actual regulatory outcomes.

� Our Investigative Methodology#

Evidence-Based Analysis#

  • Primary Source Research: Direct examination of legal documents, leaked files, and official statements
  • Cross-Reference Verification: Multiple independent sources required for factual claims
  • Timeline Analysis: Chronological examination to identify inconsistencies and contradictions

Transparency Standards#

  • Source Attribution: Clear citation of all materials and documents
  • Conflict Disclosure: Open about perspectives and potential biases
  • Correction Policy: Transparent updates when new evidence emerges

Critical Framework#

  • Follow the Evidence: Conclusions driven by documentation, not ideology
  • Question Authority: Systematic skepticism of official narratives and corporate claims
  • Context Analysis: Understanding power structures and incentives behind public statements

Verification Methods#

  • Document Authentication: Technical analysis of leaked materials and official publications
  • Expert Consultation: Engagement with domain specialists for technical verification
  • Legal Review: Examination of court filings and regulatory documents
  • Historical Context: Placing current events within broader patterns and precedents

📚 Research Philosophy#

Independent Analysis: Free from corporate sponsorship, political party alignment, or institutional pressure.

Intellectual Honesty: Willing to challenge popular narratives when evidence demands it.

Practical Impact: Focused on information that empowers readers to make informed decisions.

ElizaOnSteroids: Where critical thinking meets investigative journalism