The high-profile lawsuit against Bill Gates, Mark Rutte and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla has failed – not on substance, but due to a fatal procedural error by the lawyers.

Three new plaintiffs, one arrested lawyer – and a controversial statement: Pfizer did not test for transmission before market launch. Is this even a traditional vaccine?

1. Core Conflict: Civil Lawsuit vs. Criminal Law

Since 2023, seven Dutch citizens have been pursuing a purely civil legal proceeding (Case number: C/23/1234) against:

• Mark Rutte (former Prime Minister)
• Marion Koopmans (Virologist, former WHO advisor)
• Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO)
• Bill Gates (as a private individual, not for the Gates Foundation)

Allegation: Intentional deception regarding efficacy, long-term effects and safety of COVID-19 vaccines, which allegedly led to “physical, psychological and financial damages.”
Objective: No criminal conviction, but monetary compensation – estimated up to €500,000 per plaintiff.
Legal basis: Dutch Civil Code (Art. 6:162 BW – unlawful act).

1. Core Conflict: Civil Claim vs. Criminal Charges

Since 2023, seven Dutch citizens have filed a purely civil lawsuit (Case No.: C/23/1234) against:

• Mark Rutte (former Prime Minister)
• Marion Koopmans (Virologist, ex-WHO advisor)
• Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO)
• Bill Gates (as private individual, not representing Gates Foundation)

Allegations: Deliberate misrepresentation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, long-term effects, and safety, causing “physical, psychological, and financial harm”.
Objective: Financial compensation (up to €500,000 per plaintiff) – not criminal prosecution.
Legal Basis: Dutch Civil Code (Art. 6:162 BW – unlawful act).