Skip to main content
  1. Blog/

The Cologne Protocols, Part 4: The Incidence Machine — Testing Without Reason, Numbers Without Meaning

The Cologne Protocols - This article is part of a series.
Part 4: This Article

For over two years, a single number dictated life in Germany: the incidence. Lockdowns, school closures, contact restrictions, and curfews all depended on it. Whoever controlled the incidence controlled the measures. The Cologne Corona Protocols now reveal how this number was assessed internally — and how little it said about the actual threat level.

“Where much is measured, much is found”
#

On March 13, 2020 — four days before the RKI upgraded the risk assessment to “high” — the Cologne crisis team recorded an assessment that never made it into the public debate with such clarity:

“The virus is present in the general population. Where much is measured, much is found. Currently no escalation.”

The connection between testing frequency and case numbers was internally known. The more people were tested, the more “cases” were found — regardless of whether the tested individuals were sick or not.

Mass Testing Against RKI Recommendations
#

The RKI protocols show that the RKI itself did not recommend indiscriminate testing of healthy individuals. The pandemic plans, specifically designed for such situations, explicitly excluded widespread testing of asymptomatic people.

Nevertheless, mass testing of healthy people also took place in Cologne. The Cologne Protocols document the establishment of an enormous testing infrastructure: test centers, serial testing in schools, daycares, and nursing homes, and later free rapid tests for everyone. Our keyword analysis of the protocols revealed 4,875 hits in the “Test/Incidence” category alone.

Case Numbers Disconnected from Reality
#

A diagram discussed in the crisis team on March 15, 2020, strikingly illustrates the problem: while the curve of confirmed cases rose sharply, the number of deaths remained at a minimum.

This decoupling was no secret. It was visible in the data available to the crisis team. And yet, case numbers — not the burden of disease, not the hospitalization rate, not deaths — became the benchmark for all measures.

Incidence as a Political Instrument
#

The federal emergency brake in April 2021 made incidence a legal mandate: at an incidence of 100, stricter measures automatically took effect; at 165, schools were closed. A number heavily dependent on testing frequency became the trigger for restrictions on fundamental rights.

It was internally known what the Cologne crisis team had already noted on March 10, 2020, regarding school closures:

“There must be verified positive findings, no fear-mongering. […] Different closures may lead to panic.”

The warning against panic-mongering due to unverified findings stands in direct contradiction to a policy based on indiscriminate mass testing and the incidences derived from it.

The Testing Industry
#

What began as a protective measure evolved into an industry. Test centers sprang up everywhere, billions in taxpayer money flowed into rapid tests. The Cologne Protocols document this development at the municipal level: the organization of test centers, the coordination of serial testing, the enormous logistical and personnel effort.

Substantive discussions about the significance of the tests — about Ct values, about false positives, about whether a positive test indicates an infection or an illness — are absent from the protocols.

Conclusion
#

The incidence was not a neutral metric. It was a product of the testing strategy. The more testing, the higher the incidence. The higher the incidence, the stricter the measures. The stricter the measures, the more testing was done.

The Cologne Protocols show: this vicious cycle was recognizable internally. “Where much is measured, much is found” — a statement that would have been dismissed as “downplaying” in public debate. In the internal protocol of the crisis team, it stands as a sober observation.


This is Part 4 of “The Cologne Protocols” series. In the final part: The vaccination pressure at the municipal level.


Sources:

  1. City of Cologne COVID Crisis Team: Protocols of 203 sessions (FOI request by René Röderstein, released March 27, 2026)
  2. FragDenStaat: FOI Request #304562
  3. Bastian Barucker: Corona Protocols of the City of Cologne — Part 1, barucker.press, April 2026
  4. RKI: Internal COVID-19 Crisis Team Protocols
  5. Berliner Zeitung: How Jens Spahn conjured up the pandemic through testing
  6. Podcast: Cologne Corona Protocols, Bastian Barucker
  7. Internal keyword analysis of the protocols: 4,875 hits in category “Test/Incidence”
The Cologne Protocols - This article is part of a series.
Part 4: This Article

Related

The Cologne Protocols, Part 1: They Knew — And Did It Anyway

The City of Cologne’s COVID crisis team met from March 4, 2020 to January 20, 2023 in 203 sessions. Over 12,000 pages of protocols document how Germany’s fourth-largest city implemented pandemic policy. These documents are now public — obtained by Cologne citizen René Röderstein through a freedom of information request that took two years.

The Cologne Protocols, Part 5: Vaccination Pressure at the Municipal Level — And the Forgotten Side Effects

The COVID-19 vaccination campaign was the largest immunization effort in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany. Within months, millions of people were vaccinated — initially voluntarily, then under increasing pressure. The Cologne Corona Protocols document how this pressure was enforced down to the municipal level. And they reveal a remarkable gap: the question of side effects.

The Cologne Protocols, Part 2: The Children Who Were Never at Risk — And They Knew It

In March 2020, schools and daycare centers across Germany were closed, and sports and recreational facilities for children were shut down. An entire generation suffered massive impairments in their development. The official justification: protection from the pandemic. But the now-published Cologne Corona Protocols reveal that those responsible knew better.

The Dam Breaks: The Telegraph Reports What We've Documented for Years

Nikola Brindley had been a dental nurse for over a decade. She knew vaccines. When she was asked to take AstraZeneca’s COVID jab in July 2021, she agreed without hesitation. Within hours, she was in A&E. Multiple organ systems began to fail. “I collapsed on the doorway and pretty much lost the ability to walk,” she recalls. Today, she uses a wheelchair.