“Will we still need humans?”
“Not for most things.”
— Bill Gates, 2025
Hosted by the Devil
The image of the devil entering the world through data centers is just a symbol — a metaphor for a far more complex, systemic conspiracy. It’s not just about ruthless ambition, but about deeply embedded mechanisms that govern the development and deployment of artificial intelligence. The illusion of neutrality serves as a sophisticated lever for power expansion — a tool to consolidate control and deepen societal fragmentation.
2019 was a turning point. The founding of “OpenAI” was staged as a milestone in a humanistic AI revolution. The name promised openness and transparency — but behind this appearance was a strategic power move. Microsoft invested $13 billion and tied OpenAI exclusively to its cloud infrastructure. The “non-profit” rhetoric turned out to be a facade; real power shifted into a closed, proprietary system.
Control wasn’t limited to hosting. Most of the training data came from sources routed through Microsoft’s Azure. By 2023, about 80% of training data from public repositories was funneled into Microsoft’s hands. These formerly open platforms for collaborative knowledge became digital fortresses — governed by algorithms aligned with Microsoft’s interests. Even “private” projects are now silently absorbed into models — a quiet monopolization of collective knowledge.
Original Quote
“People think, wow, this is a bit creepy.
It’s totally new territory.
Will we still need humans?
– Ah, not for most things.
Ah, you know, we’ll just…
We’ll make it work.
I mean…”
Bill Gates: The Architect of Dependency
Gates’ genius lies not in invention, but in systematizing lock-in. His method since the 1980s:
- Buy (MS-DOS, Navision, GitHub)
- Bundle (Windows with IE, Teams with Office)
- Shut down (Skype-XMPP, Copilot trained on Open Source)
- Replace (Humans with APIs)
“Every Microsoft ‘innovation’ is a grave for autonomous action.”
Digital Enclosure: Code as the New Commons
| Middle Ages | 21st Century |
|---|---|
| Communal pasture | Open-source repositories |
| Fencing by nobility | Azure exclusivity deals |
| Serfdom | Copilot subscriptions |
GitHub Example:
- 2018: Acquired for $7.5B
- 2023: 80% of AI training data sourced from public repos
- 2025: Even “private” projects feed Microsoft’s models
“They take our commons — and sell us back the rent.”
OpenAI: The Trojan Horse
- 2019: “Non-profit for safe AI”
- 2023: Microsoft invests $13B — exclusive Azure deal
- 2025: GPT-7 runs only through Teams/Windows integrations
The lie in the name:
“Open” AI is trained on closed data, runs on closed infrastructure, and delivers closed answers.
“A black box pretending to be a mirror.”
The Illusion of Neutral AI
The cultural bias is no accident. The dominance of English-language data — already noted in 2019 — has worsened due to the increasing integration of Western open-source content. According to Stanford (2024), 78% of training data is in English, and 92% comes from a Western context. Today’s AI responses reflect this asymmetry — not just linguistically, but ideologically.
Who filters the worldview?
- Training data: 78% English, 92% Western (Stanford 2024)
- Censorship: Criticism of Microsoft partners is filtered
- API Policy: EU documents must be pre-parsed via Azure
“GPT can quote Marx — but not for class analysis.”
Exit Strategies
| Path | Sabotage |
|---|---|
| Local LLMs | “Ethical” licenses |
| Decentralized infrastructure | Patent litigation |
| Political regulation | Lobbying ($26M/year from Microsoft) |
The harsh truth:
“Whoever controls the cloud leaves no exit door open.”
The Myth of Inevitability
“We’ll make it work.” – Gates
Framing AI as a “law of nature,” as unstoppable progress, is nothing more than ideological dogma. 94% of all AI research is funded by Big Tech. Research, development, discourse — all infiltrated by those profiting from the tech. Politics adopts this framing — e.g., AI laws that imply cloud dependency — and legitimizes a structural reliance on Microsoft’s infrastructure.
“What is sold as a natural law is just a business model.”
The Devil Wears Data Centers
Microsoft is not “evil” — it has perfected structural dependency:
- From commons to Azure
- From enlightenment to APIs
- From acting to subscribing
“Your thinking is now an add-on.”
elizaonsteroids.org Responds
We break the facade:
- Those who ask control the dialogue
- Those who host control the answer
- Those who profit laugh at “neutrality”
“Humans don’t have an update function.
That’s why they must be uninstalled.”