The COVID-19 vaccination campaign was the largest immunization effort in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany. Within months, millions of people were vaccinated — initially voluntarily, then under increasing pressure. The Cologne Corona Protocols document how this pressure was enforced down to the municipal level. And they reveal a remarkable gap: the question of side effects.
For over two years, a single number dictated life in Germany: the incidence. Lockdowns, school closures, contact restrictions, and curfews all depended on it. Whoever controlled the incidence controlled the measures. The Cologne Corona Protocols now reveal how this number was assessed internally — and how little it said about the actual threat level.
The fear of a collapsing healthcare system, of overcrowded intensive care units and triage decisions, shaped the public debate during the coronavirus pandemic. The Cologne Corona Protocols now reveal how this narrative was assessed internally — and that reality often told a different story.
In March 2020, schools and daycare centers across Germany were closed, and sports and recreational facilities for children were shut down. An entire generation suffered massive impairments in their development. The official justification: protection from the pandemic. But the now-published Cologne Corona Protocols reveal that those responsible knew better.
The City of Cologne’s COVID crisis team met from March 4, 2020 to January 20, 2023 in 203 sessions. Over 12,000 pages of protocols document how Germany’s fourth-largest city implemented pandemic policy. These documents are now public — obtained by Cologne citizen René Röderstein through a freedom of information request that took two years.
In December 2020, Germany’s Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI) launched the SafeVac 2.0 smartphone app. More than 700,000 people used it to report adverse reactions following COVID-19 vaccination. It was the largest vaccine safety study Germany had ever conducted.
Update April 3, 2026: Article expanded with Japanese PMDA approval documents: missing studies, S-protein detected in ovaries, post-marketing data from Japan.
There is one critical difference between a conventional mRNA vaccine and what the EU approved in February 2025.
Introduction # Five years have passed since the world was plunged into the chaos of the Corona pandemic. While many believe the dust has settled, the truth is far from being fully uncovered. A recent discussion in the German Bundestag, titled “5 Years of Corona: Was It a Military Operation, and What Did Pfizer Know?”, shed light on some disturbing revelations. Let’s examine the key points and explore their implications.
Scientific Communication vs. Political Messaging # The “Pandemic of the Unvaccinated” Discrepancy # On November 3, 2021, German Health Minister Jens Spahn publicly stated Germany was facing a “pandemic of the unvaccinated.” However, internal RKI protocols from November 5, 2021, reveal significant institutional concerns:
