Skip to main content
  1. Blog/

Söder Explains Himself: The Injection, Cow Ears, and 100,000 Lives Saved

Corona Accountability - This article is part of a series.
Part : This Article

In a recent interview, Bavaria’s Minister-President Markus Söder offered his view on the Corona era. Two minutes that pack a punch — not for what he says, but for what he leaves out.

What Söder Says
#

“You went to the doctor, or at school they shoved a needle into you without any empathy — that was completely normal.”

He’s talking about the childhood vaccinations of his youth. Polio, measles — all unremarkable, no one asked questions. Then came the Corona critics who suddenly started “questioning scientific processes.” He found this “completely incomprehensible.”

“Old pamphlets against the smallpox vaccination mandate are completely identical to the accusations made during Corona. The only difference: back then they claimed you’d grow cow ears.”

And the crowning moment:

“Through our early intervention, we definitely saved nearly 100,000 lives.”

No regret. Not a word about mistakes. Instead: “There’s nothing to be ashamed of.”

What Söder Doesn’t Say
#

The “Injection” Was Not a Polio Vaccine
#

The rhetorical trick is transparent: Söder equates the mRNA injection — an emergency authorization without completed carcinogenicity studies — with childhood vaccines proven over decades.

The difference:

Söder knows this. He makes the comparison anyway — because it works. Anyone who objects is placed alongside the “cow ears” farmers.

“Cow Ears” vs. DNA Contamination
#

The smallpox parallel is Söder’s masterpiece of trivialization. He paints a picture: stupid people, irrational fears, then and now.

What he calls “cow ears” in 2026 amounts to:

  • DNA contaminations in Comirnaty — documented by McKernan et al. and confirmed by Dr. Helmut Sterz, former Chief Toxicologist of Pfizer Europe
  • Placental transfer of the foreign gene — published by a German research group
  • Persistence of foreign mRNA for years after injection
  • A BGH ruling requiring manufacturers to disclose information

These are not pamphlets. These are peer-reviewed studies and court judgments.

“100,000 Lives Saved” — The Söder Number
#

Söder himself admits it: A “estimate” from the Bavarian State Office for Health. In the subjunctive: “if we had done things differently, what might have happened.”

A hypothetical model. No measured data. No comparison with states that were more relaxed — because that comparison would show that Bavaria, despite its harshest measures, had no significantly better outcomes than more liberal states.

What the data shows:

  • Age-adjusted mortality rose in 2021 and 2022 — when the vaccine was available
  • Excess mortality in Bavaria was comparable to states without Bavarian-style restrictions
  • The RKI files show: internally, it was known that the measures were barely evidence-based

100,000 is not a number. It is a claim.

What’s Missing from Two Minutes
#

Not a word about:

  • The Enquete Commission in the Bundestag and what is coming to light there
  • The RKI files and the internal documentation of decision-making processes
  • Vaccine-injured individuals — people who became ill from the injection he promoted
  • The BGH ruling of March 9, 2026 — a milestone for accountability
  • The BioNTech founder’s departure — a coincidence in timing?
  • The 2G/2G+ rules in Bavaria, which excluded the unvaccinated from public life

Instead: “There’s nothing to be ashamed of.”

What Remains
#

In two minutes, Markus Söder demonstrated why accountability in Germany is so difficult. Not because the facts are missing — they exist. But because those responsible tell a story in which they are the heroes.

Injection = normal. Critics = cow ears. 100,000 saved. Next topic.

The reality: a Minister-President who pushed through 2G+, banned the unvaccinated from public life, and now stands up and says he simply doesn’t understand how anyone could “question scientific processes.”

Questioning science IS the scientific process, Mr. Söder. You demonstrated that in two minutes — just not in the way you intended.


Sources:

Corona Accountability - This article is part of a series.
Part : This Article

Related

RKI Protocols Unredacted: How Science Was Politically Overridden

A journalist sues. A court decides. 2,500 pages confirm what three years of “conspiracy theory” suppressed: the RKI acted on political orders — not scientific evidence. # The Man Who Didn’t Give Up # Paul Schreyer is a journalist and co-editor of Multipolar Magazine. Not an activist, not a Telegram influencer — a journalist who used Germany’s Freedom of Information Act (IFG) for its intended purpose: making state action transparent.

Enquete Commission: Ex-Pfizer Toxicologist Calls mRNA Vaccination a Human Experiment — Lauterbach Admits Transmission Protection Was a Lie

On March 19, 2026, something happened in the Bundestag that the media would rather downplay as a “heated exchange.” In truth, it was an indictment. # The Bundestag’s Corona Enquete Commission convened on Thursday under the title “Healthcare System Performance, Vaccination Strategy, and Research.” What was planned as a sober review turned into a tribunal over the federal government’s vaccination policy. So uncomfortable that audience members were expelled from the chamber — not because they were disruptive, but because they applauded [1][2].

"Jesus Would Get Vaccinated" — How the Churches Betrayed Their Own Faith

657,000 People Left the Church in 2025. NIUS Blames “Wokeness.” The Real Problem Remains Unspoken. # 657,000 people left Germany’s two major churches in 2025 — 350,000 Protestants, 307,000 Catholics [1]. Since 2019, the churches have lost over 4 million members. From 44 million down to under 37 million. An exodus of biblical proportions.

Case File Restle — Unsolved

Has anyone seen Georg Restle? Last spotted in Nairobi. There is a German television legend you need to know to truly understand Georg Restle: Eduard Zimmermann. For thirty years, Zimmermann sat behind his desk at ZDF, furrowed his brow into the camera, and asked: “Have you seen this man?” He was judge, moral authority, and guardian of public order in one person — all on state television, all with a sense of mission, all without the slightest hint of self-doubt.

Alena Buyx: From the Ethics of Exclusion to the Ethics of Gene Editing

73 instances of plagiarism in her dissertation, declared 2G exclusion ethically acceptable, pocketed the Federal Cross of Merit — and now she advises the WHO on genome editing. Alena Buyx has had a remarkable career. In a functioning democracy, that career would have ended long ago. In Germany, you get the Federal Cross of Merit for it.