This series is not a call to avoid vaccination. It is a call to verify the foundations — before building mandates, liability exemptions, and social division upon them.
What would be needed to answer the questions from the previous five parts?
When discussing vaccinations, you quickly end up with the individual case: this side effect, that study, this expert. What’s rarely asked is the foundation: was the central assumption — vaccination protects — ever empirically established?
Before discussing side effects, efficacy rates, or mandates — a foundational question must be asked:
Was the central assumption that vaccination protects ever empirically established?
This isn’t a question from fringe corners of the internet. It’s a methodological question raised by physicians and researchers in peer-reviewed literature — people who have been vaccinating for decades.
A journalist sues. A court decides. 2,500 pages confirm what three years of “conspiracy theory” suppressed: the RKI acted on political orders — not scientific evidence. # The Man Who Didn’t Give Up # Paul Schreyer is a journalist and co-editor of Multipolar Magazine. Not an activist, not a Telegram influencer — a journalist who used Germany’s Freedom of Information Act (IFG) for its intended purpose: making state action transparent.
Climate change is one of the most debated topics of our time — and yet the debate is often conducted within a surprisingly narrow frame. A geologist who has been researching climate questions since the late 1970s raises, in a short video, questions that rarely find space in public discourse: what does Earth’s geological history actually tell us about CO2? And what happens when tectonic dynamics are removed from the conversation?
The COVID-19 pandemic has shaped the world in various ways over the past few years, and one of the most controversial developments is the discussion surrounding the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines. In this blog post, we take a scientific look at the so-called “pandemic of the vaccinated” and examine what the latest scientific findings have to say about it.
Introduction # Christian Drosten, often referred to as “Germany’s Corona explainer,” became a central figure during the pandemic. However, a closer examination of his scientific methods and political reversals raises fundamental questions about the role of scientists in pandemic politics. His career reveals a system of rapidly developed tests, contradictory statements, and questionable institutional arrangements that deserve critical review.
