124 States Said Yes. The US Said No. And Germany Is Paying the Bill. # In May 2025, 124 WHO member states adopted an international pandemic agreement in Geneva — the most far-reaching health accord since the International Health Regulations of 2005. Eleven states abstained, including Italy, Poland, Israel, Russia, and Iran. No state voted against it [1][2].
73 instances of plagiarism in her dissertation, declared 2G exclusion ethically acceptable, pocketed the Federal Cross of Merit — and now she advises the WHO on genome editing.
Alena Buyx has had a remarkable career. In a functioning democracy, that career would have ended long ago. In Germany, you get the Federal Cross of Merit for it.
Everyone is staring at the wrong thing.
Since the Epstein files dropped, public attention has locked onto the obvious — prominent names, sexual misconduct, a convicted pedophile with impossible connections. That story is real and it matters. But Prof. Roland Wiesendanger, physicist and nanoscientist at the University of Hamburg, spent his time in the documents looking somewhere else. And what he found is arguably bigger.
When a Health Minister with a Questionable Track Record Aims for the Top of Global Health Policy # Karl Lauterbach is being floated as a candidate for the position of WHO Director-General. You have to read that sentence twice to grasp what is happening. The man who promoted the COVID vaccine as “more or less side-effect-free” — on national television, in February 2022, to an audience of millions — is supposed to decide the health policy of the entire planet.
The fourth Corona symposium of the AfD parliamentary group took place in the Berlin Bundestag [0]. The event, held under the motto of critically examining Corona policy and its consequences, featured numerous speakers from Germany and abroad, including doctors, scientists, lawyers, and political actors. The goal was to network “vigilant citizens against the overreaching state” and demand comprehensive accountability for the past years [0].
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have witnessed an unprecedented global response that has had profound impacts on our society, our healthcare systems, and our daily lives. While many of us thought the worst storm had passed, more and more questions and concerns are emerging about the safety and long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines. In this article, we take a detailed look at current revelations and studies that provide alarming insights into the potential risks and side effects of these vaccines.
Operation Lockstep: A Comprehensive Critical Analysis of Global Health and Security Initiatives
In a world constantly confronted with challenges, the concept of Operation Lockstep remains a central theme that significantly shapes how nations approach global health and security. Sketched by the Rockefeller Foundation, this concept envisions a future where heightened government control and surveillance follow global health crises. While official narratives emphasize the necessity of such measures to better prepare the world for future threats, there is growing skepticism about who truly holds the reins.
Introduction # Five years have passed since the world was plunged into the chaos of the Corona pandemic. While many believe the dust has settled, the truth is far from being fully uncovered. A recent discussion in the German Bundestag, titled “5 Years of Corona: Was It a Military Operation, and What Did Pfizer Know?”, shed light on some disturbing revelations. Let’s examine the key points and explore their implications.
