The provided summary is based on a recent conversation (likely a video interview) with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a renowned oncologist, biotech entrepreneur, and founder of ImmunityBio. Soon-Shiong has presented similar theses in several public appearances, including interviews with Tucker Carlson in March 2025 and posts on X. The claims are largely plausible and supported by scientific literature where verifiable. However, they represent a mix of established facts, preliminary observations, and speculative hypotheses. The specific study on COVID-19 and p53 inhibition, conducted with Dr. Carlos Cadona, has not been published by November 2025. Soon-Shiong describes it as “soon to be published,” indicating ongoing research but not yet providing peer-reviewed evidence.
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have witnessed an unprecedented global response that has had profound impacts on our society, our healthcare systems, and our daily lives. While many of us thought the worst storm had passed, more and more questions and concerns are emerging about the safety and long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines. In this article, we take a detailed look at current revelations and studies that provide alarming insights into the potential risks and side effects of these vaccines.
The renowned pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson describes the global mRNA vaccination campaign as “devastating and unprecedented” – an attack on human biology. Data from a Pfizer study in Japan, made accessible through a freedom of information request, show that the lipid nanoparticles of the COVID-19 vaccines distribute throughout the body, particularly in the ovaries and adrenal glands, which are central organs of the endocrine and reproductive systems. Hodkinson views the effects on female fertility as potentially permanent, since women are born with a limited number of eggs, and an immunological attack on these cells could irreparably damage the reservoir.
The COVID-19 pandemic has shaped the world in various ways over the past few years, and one of the most controversial developments is the discussion surrounding the long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines. In this blog post, we take a scientific look at the so-called “pandemic of the vaccinated” and examine what the latest scientific findings have to say about it.
As a concerned reader of the manuscript “Vaccine-associated viral immune escape: not just a matter of vaccine efficacy!,” I am compelled to share my thoughts on the alarming implications of mass COVID-19 vaccination. This document presents a sobering perspective on how our global response to the pandemic might be inadvertently creating a new, more insidious threat.
Published September 18, 2025 | Source: Prof. Klaus Steger
In a groundbreaking revelation, official Pfizer approval documents have confirmed what was long dismissed as “conspiracy theory”: The COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty actually contains SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences and residual DNA packaged together with modRNA in lipid nanoparticles. This disclosure raises fundamental questions about the safety and transparency of a vaccine administered to millions worldwide.
In an era where emotions can be easily manipulated, public broadcasters like ZDF have a special responsibility to deliver well-founded and balanced information. Yet often it seems as if these stations rely more on sensationalism and fear-mongering rather than empirical data and scientific facts.
RKI-Leaks: Extended Analysis of Germany’s Pandemic Response Crisis # Comprehensive Investigation into Scientific Manipulation and Political Interference
Executive Summary # The RKI leaks represent the most significant documentation of political interference in scientific institutions in post-war German history. This 10GB cache of unredacted documents reveals systematic manipulation where political agendas consistently overruled scientific evidence, fundamentally undermining public trust in both government institutions and scientific advice.
Introduction # Christian Drosten, often referred to as “Germany’s Corona explainer,” became a central figure during the pandemic. However, a closer examination of his scientific methods and political reversals raises fundamental questions about the role of scientists in pandemic politics. His career reveals a system of rapidly developed tests, contradictory statements, and questionable institutional arrangements that deserve critical review.
