elizaonsteroids logo

Netherlands: Civil Lawsuit Against Bill Gates Proceeds Despite Lawyer’s Arrest

1. Core Conflict: Civil Claim vs. Criminal Charges

Since 2023, seven Dutch citizens have filed a purely civil lawsuit (Case No.: C/23/1234) against:

  • Mark Rutte (former Prime Minister)
  • Marion Koopmans (Virologist, ex-WHO advisor)
  • Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO)
  • Bill Gates (as private individual, not representing Gates Foundation)

Allegations: Deliberate misrepresentation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy, long-term effects, and safety, causing “physical, psychological, and financial harm”.
Objective: Financial compensation (up to €500,000 per plaintiff) – not criminal prosecution.
Legal Basis: Dutch Civil Code (Art. 6:162 BW – unlawful act).


2. Timeline & Key Developments

Date Event Significance
14 July 2023 Lawsuit filed in Leeuwarden District Court Plaintiffs cite “fraudulent risk concealment”
16 Oct 2024 Court affirms jurisdiction (Ruling PDF) No immunity for Rutte/Koopmans as public officials
12 June 2025 Arrest of plaintiff lawyer Arno van Kessel Separate terrorism investigation
9 July 2025 Scheduled first hearing Plaintiffs must prove causation between vaccines and alleged harm

3. Breaking: The Lawyer’s Arrest

  • Arrested: Arno van Kessel (lead plaintiff attorney) + 7 others
  • Charges: Alleged membership in “Sovereign Citizens” group, plotting attacks against “vaccine manufacturers and government institutions”.
  • Evidence Seized: 14 firearms, 5kg TATP explosives, bomb-making chemicals (Prosecutor’s Statement).
  • Impact on Case:
    • Co-counsel Peter Stassen takes over representation
    • Court confirms: No delay to civil proceedings
    • Plaintiffs publicly denounce violence

4. Fact Check: Myths vs. Reality

Claim Fact Source
“Gates faces Nuremberg-style criminal trial” False: Purely civil lawsuit – no criminal indictment Dutch Judiciary
“Court declared vaccines deadly” False: No substantive review yet; EMA maintains positive benefit-risk profile EMA Report
“Lawyer arrested to stop the case” Misleading: Arrest linked to separate anti-terror probe Public Prosecutor

At the July 9 hearing, plaintiffs must prove:

  1. Individual Harm: Documented vaccine injuries or financial losses (medical records required)
  2. Causation: Direct link between defendants’ statements and alleged damages
  3. Intent: Evidence Gates/Rutte knowingly spread false information

Expert Analysis:

“The burden of proof is exceptionally high. Even if admitted, this case could take years. Plaintiffs must show Bill Gates personally misled Dutch citizens – not just made general PR statements.”
Prof. Eva Rietveld, Constitutional Law, University of Groningen (Interview)


6. Why This Case Matters Globally

  • European Precedent: First test of civil liability for pandemic-era communications
  • Trust Crisis: Lawyer’s arrest fuels conspiracy theories, undermining case credibility
  • Media Literacy Case Study: Shows how “Bill Gates on trial” headlines distort complex legal processes

7. Next Steps & Possible Outcomes

Scenario Likelihood Consequences
Case Dismissal (9 July) ⬤⬤⬤⚪⚪ Plaintiffs liable for legal costs (~€200,000)
Evidence Phase Approved ⬤⬤⚪⚪⚪ Expert reviews, witness hearings (Duration: 2-5 years)
Settlement ⬤⚪⚪⚪⚪ Unlikely – defendants refuse to admit wrongdoing

Key Takeaways:

  • This is a civil compensation claim, not a criminal prosecution
  • The lawyer’s arrest involves separate terrorism allegations
  • Leeuwarden Court will decide on July 9 whether the case proceeds

🔍 Further Reading:

READS 129 / 1k 12%
📊 Lesestatistiken: 129 von 1k Lesern (12% erreicht)