Skip to main content
  1. Blog/

The Woman Who Deletes: How Ursula von der Leyen Fails Upward

EU Politics - This article is part of a series.
Part : This Article

Deleted texts, destroyed evidence, billions in secret deals — and a promotion every time.
#

There is a pattern in Ursula von der Leyen’s career that would end anyone else’s. Every time an investigation closes in, data disappears. Every time evidence is destroyed, she gets promoted. It’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s her documented track record.


The Pattern
#

Act I: The Bundeswehr Consultant Affair (2018-2019)
#

As Germany’s Defense Minister, von der Leyen’s ministry spent hundreds of millions of euros on external consultants — McKinsey, Accenture, and others — with accusations of cronyism, improper contract allocation, and personal connections driving procurement decisions [1][2].

When the German parliament launched an investigation, they requested her phone data.

The phone had been wiped. “For security reasons,” the ministry said. All text messages — deleted. On both her old phone and the new one. The German opposition called it “illegal destruction of evidence” [3].

Result: No consequences. Instead, she was nominated as President of the European Commission — the most powerful position in EU governance.

Act II: Pfizergate (2021-2026)
#

In spring 2021, von der Leyen personally negotiated a vaccine deal with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla — reportedly worth up to €35 billion for 1.8 billion vaccine doses. The negotiations were conducted via text messages [4][5].

When the New York Times requested access to these communications in 2022, the European Commission responded that the text messages could not be found [4].

EU Transparency Commissioner Věra Jourová confirmed: the search for messages between von der Leyen and Bourla “did not yield any results” [4].

EU Ombudswoman Emily O’Reilly classified this as “maladministration” — official EU language for institutional misconduct [4][5].

In May 2025, the EU’s highest court ruled that the Commission lost on all counts — it had failed to plausibly explain why the texts don’t exist [6].

In August 2025, POLITICO revealed that the Commission had reviewed the texts before they disappeared. Von der Leyen’s Chief of Staff was identified as responsible for the deletion [7].

Result: No consequences. She remains Commission President.


The Timeline of Disappearing Data
#

Year Scandal What Disappeared Result
2019 Bundeswehr consultant affair Phone data wiped — “security reasons” Promoted to EU Commission President
2021 Pfizer vaccine deal SMS with Bourla — “not found” Re-elected Commission President
2025 Pfizergate court ruling Commission loses, still no texts Remains in power
2025 POLITICO reveals texts were reviewed before deletion Chief of Staff identified No consequences

The Deal Nobody Can See
#

The Pfizer contract is the largest pharmaceutical deal in European history. Up to €35 billion for 1.8 billion doses — negotiated via personal text messages by the head of the European Commission, without involvement of the relevant commissioners or standard procurement procedures [4][5].

Key facts:

  • The contract was negotiated personally by von der Leyen via SMS with Pfizer CEO Bourla
  • No procurement process as required for deals of this magnitude
  • The full contract terms remain classified
  • The EU Court of Auditors has been denied access to unredacted versions
  • EU member states are legally bound to purchase doses whether needed or not
  • Hundreds of millions of doses were later destroyed unused

Who Is Ursula von der Leyen?
#

Before becoming the most powerful woman in Europe, von der Leyen’s track record includes:

  • PhD thesis (1991): Investigated for plagiarism by the Hannover Medical School. The university found “significant shortcomings” but did not revoke the degree [8].
  • Family Minister (2005-2009): Pushed internet censorship laws (dubbed “Zensursula” by critics)
  • Defense Minister (2013-2019): Bundeswehr readiness declined. Consultant affair. Phone wiped.
  • Commission President (2019-present): Pfizergate. Texts deleted. Re-elected.

The pattern is consistent: controversy, deleted evidence, promotion.


Why This Matters
#

This isn’t about left vs. right politics. This is about the basic principle that public officials must be accountable for public money.

€35 billion of European taxpayers’ money was committed through personal text messages. Those messages were destroyed. The person who destroyed them — or ordered their destruction — faces no consequences. And the person who negotiated the deal continues to lead Europe.

In any functioning democracy, this would trigger:

  • A criminal investigation
  • Parliamentary hearings
  • Resignation or removal from office

In the European Union of 2026, it triggers a second term.


The Question
#

Every European citizen should ask:

What was in those text messages that was worth deleting?

If the deal was fair, transparent, and in the public interest — why delete the evidence?

If the deal was not fair, transparent, or in the public interest — then we have a problem that makes every other political scandal in Europe look like a parking ticket.


Sources
#

[1] DW (2018): Bundestag to probe defense minister over contracts. dw.com

[2] POLITICO (2019): The scandal hanging over Ursula von der Leyen. politico.eu

[3] DW (2019): Defense Ministry ‘illegally’ wiped von der Leyen’s phone. dw.com

[4] Wikipedia: Pfizergate. en.wikipedia.org

[5] POLITICO (2025): Pfizergate: Will we ever see von der Leyen’s texts? politico.eu

[6] Euronews (2025): EU Commission loses on all counts in Pfizergate legal case. euronews.com

[7] POLITICO (2025): EU executive reviewed von der Leyen’s Pfizergate texts — then let them disappear. politico.eu

[8] EUToday: Ursula von der Leyen’s Troubled Tenure as German Defence Minister. eutoday.net


In any other profession, destroying evidence twice would result in criminal charges. In EU politics, it results in a second term. Europe deserves better.


Related Articles #

EU Politics - This article is part of a series.
Part : This Article

Related

The EuG Ruling 2025 on the Pfizer SMS Scandal: A Detailed Overview

The ruling of the General Court of the European Union (EuG) of May 14, 2025 (case number T-36/23) marks a decisive blow against the EU Commission in the so-called “Pfizergate”. The case concerns the Commission’s refusal to disclose text messages (SMS) between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. The plaintiff, the New York Times (represented by journalist Matina Stevis-Gridneff), was vindicated: The Commission must re-examine the request and release the messages – if they exist. The ruling underscores the transparency obligation of EU institutions and sharply criticizes the Commission for inadequate documentation of digital communication.

EU in CHAOS: What I Know (Nov 10, 2025) - The Full Download

Haha, EU in chaos? – That’s like fish in water: constant, but right now it’s seriously boiling! Ursula von der Leyen sits at the center of the storm, with Pfizergate as the main fireworks, plus budget wars, right-wing rise, and geopolitical mayhem. I’ve checked it fresh (Web + X), and here’s the unfiltered comprehensive breakdown: facts, scandals, reactions. No bullshit, just the raw truth. Let’s dive in – from Brussels to hell (proxy-approved).

The Princess in the Ivory Tower: Ursula von der Leyen and the 13th Floor

In the sacred halls of the Berlaymont building in Brussels, more precisely on the 13th floor, resides a woman who feels far removed from the everyday concerns of EU citizens. Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, has created a small empire there, accessible only to a select few. But what lies behind the locked doors and strictly controlled access?

Classified: Merkel — Why the Stasi File of Europe's Most Powerful Woman Remains Secret

On March 13, 2026, the First Chamber of the Berlin Administrative Court delivered a ruling that barely made headlines. Presiding Judge Jens Tegtmeier stated clearly: Marcel Luthe, former FDP member of parliament and plaintiff, had “no legal claim to the release” of possible Stasi files on Angela Merkel under the Stasi Records Act.