The previous parts of this series described historical patterns: methodological weaknesses, late discovery of contaminations, liability exemptions. Part 5 shows that these patterns with the mRNA vaccine are not the exception but the rule.
There is a question that is rarely asked, but that puts the entire debate in a different light:
Why do vaccine manufacturers need statutory liability protection if their product is safe?
Your browser cannot play this video. Download video.
Originalvideo: Marc Friedrich auf YouTube
Who Is Speaking Here? # Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi — immunologist, former head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology in Mainz, one of Germany’s most cited physicians. Since 2020, a critic of Covid vaccination policy.
The Danish data shows what should never have happened: Identical product, completely different outcomes. Some batches cause illness. Some do — nothing at all. # In December 2025, Hamburg mathematics professor Hans-Juergen Bandelt published the first part of a three-part analysis on tkp.at. His starting point: the Danish study by Schmeling and Manniche, peer-reviewed and published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation in 2023 [1]. His finding: More than 30% of BioNTech batches were practically ineffective — and the PEI knew it [2][3][4].
On March 19, 2026, something happened in the Bundestag that the media would rather downplay as a “heated exchange.” In truth, it was an indictment. # The Bundestag’s Corona Enquete Commission convened on Thursday under the title “Healthcare System Performance, Vaccination Strategy, and Research.” What was planned as a sober review turned into a tribunal over the federal government’s vaccination policy. So uncomfortable that audience members were expelled from the chamber — not because they were disruptive, but because they applauded [1][2].
The ruling of the General Court of the European Union (EuG) of May 14, 2025 (case number T-36/23) marks a decisive blow against the EU Commission in the so-called “Pfizergate”. The case concerns the Commission’s refusal to disclose text messages (SMS) between EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. The plaintiff, the New York Times (represented by journalist Matina Stevis-Gridneff), was vindicated: The Commission must re-examine the request and release the messages – if they exist. The ruling underscores the transparency obligation of EU institutions and sharply criticizes the Commission for inadequate documentation of digital communication.
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have witnessed an unprecedented global response that has had profound impacts on our society, our healthcare systems, and our daily lives. While many of us thought the worst storm had passed, more and more questions and concerns are emerging about the safety and long-term effects of COVID-19 vaccines. In this article, we take a detailed look at current revelations and studies that provide alarming insights into the potential risks and side effects of these vaccines.
Published September 18, 2025 | Source: Prof. Klaus Steger
In a groundbreaking revelation, official Pfizer approval documents have confirmed what was long dismissed as “conspiracy theory”: The COVID-19 vaccine Comirnaty actually contains SV40 promoter-enhancer sequences and residual DNA packaged together with modRNA in lipid nanoparticles. This disclosure raises fundamental questions about the safety and transparency of a vaccine administered to millions worldwide.
Introduction # Five years have passed since the world was plunged into the chaos of the Corona pandemic. While many believe the dust has settled, the truth is far from being fully uncovered. A recent discussion in the German Bundestag, titled “5 Years of Corona: Was It a Military Operation, and What Did Pfizer Know?”, shed light on some disturbing revelations. Let’s examine the key points and explore their implications.
Impfstoff-Klage in den Niederlanden: Zivilverfahren gegen Bill Gates geht trotz Verhaftung des Anwalts weiter # In the Netherlands, a civil lawsuit is ongoing against Bill Gates and other prominent figures, including former Prime Minister Mark Rutte and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. The plaintiffs, seven Dutch citizens, allege that the defendants deliberately misled the public about the effectiveness, long-term effects, and safety of COVID-19 vaccines, resulting in physical, psychological, and financial damages. Filed on July 14, 2023, the lawsuit seeks compensation of up to 500,000 euros per plaintiff ^1,2,3^.
