Skip to main content
  1. Blog/

Atlantic Storm, January 2005: How a Smallpox Tabletop Became WHO Emergency Powers Four Months Later

Pandemic Politics - This article is part of a series.
Part : This Article

On 14 January 2005, in a conference room in Washington, ten former or sitting heads of government from North America and Europe — together with a former WHO Director-General and an array of foreign-policy advisers — gathered around a table and played out a coordinated smallpox attack on six major cities simultaneously: Istanbul, Rotterdam, Warsaw, Frankfurt, New York City, Los Angeles. Within four and a half hours of exercise time the reported case count climbed from 51 to 3,320. The exercise was called Atlantic Storm.

It was no covert operation. The exercise documents, the after-action report (“Navigating the Storm”), the player lists, the sponsor list, the press briefing — all public. The mechanism that makes this exercise interesting is not the scenario. It is the escalation step beyond Dark Winter (June 2001) — and the wave of policy that followed four months later.

Continuity with Dark Winter
#

The exercise designers were the same as for Dark Winter: Tara O’Toole (UPMC Center for Biosecurity, co-director) and Tom Inglesby. Both had written the Andrews-AFB smallpox script in 2001; both wrote the transatlantic script in 2005. The co-conveners were the Center for Transatlantic Relations of Johns Hopkins SAIS (Daniel Hamilton, Director) and the Transatlantic Biosecurity Network.

The three sponsors of the exercise:

  • the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation — a long-standing funder of the JHU Center for Civilian Biodefense Strategies, hence funding-line continuity from Dark Winter
  • the German Marshall Fund of the United States — a 1972-founded US-German foundation seated in Washington, financing the transatlantic foreign-policy elite-networking infrastructure
  • the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) — founded in 2001 by Sam Nunn and Ted Turner

Sam Nunn is the personnel bridge. He had played the US president in Dark Winter; four years later his NTI co-financed the follow-on exercise. The man who in 2001 had sat at the NSC table making the escalation calls financed in 2005 the tabletop in which the same calls were re-staged for the European theatre. Same designers, same pathogen choice, same funding line.

Political Escalation: From Officials’ Tabletop to Politicians’ Tabletop
#

What distinguished Atlantic Storm from Dark Winter was the player class. Dark Winter had brought together former officials, ex-intelligence directors and reporters. Atlantic Storm pulled in heads of government and a WHO Director-General.

Atlantic Storm role Player (with then-current real-life background)
US President Madeleine Albright (US Secretary of State 1997–2001)
French Prime Minister Bernard Kouchner (co-founder of Médecins Sans Frontières, pioneer of the droit d’ingérence doctrine)
German Chancellor Werner Hoyer (FDP, Minister of State at the Foreign Office 1994–1998)
Canadian Prime Minister Barbara McDougall (Canadian Foreign Minister 1991–1993)
WHO Director-General Gro Harlem Brundtland (Norway, former Prime Minister, WHO DG 1998–2003, chair of the Brundtland Commission “Our Common Future” 1987)
Polish representative Jerzy Buzek (Polish Prime Minister 1997–2001)
Swedish representative Jan Eliasson (Swedish Ambassador to the UN, later Foreign Minister)
Dutch representative Klaas de Vries (Interior Minister 2000–2002)
Italian representative Stefano Silvestri (President IAI Rome)
European Parliament voice Erika Mann (MEP 1994–2009)

This is the foreign-policy elite of two continents. On 14 January 2005 they jointly played out a smallpox attack on Frankfurt and Rotterdam and learned, in real time, what it would mean for a WHO Director-General to issue coordinating emergency recommendations to several heads of government simultaneously — without time for national parliamentary consultation.

What the Exercise Taught and What Was Decided Four Months Later
#

The Atlantic Storm after-action report formulated, as its central finding: in a transatlantic pandemic situation no adequate international coordination format exists. The WHO Director-General must be empowered to issue immediate international emergency recommendations without member states having to consent. Vaccine stockpiles must be transatlantically pooled. Travel restrictions must be internationally coordinated. Crisis communication between heads of government must be rehearsed before the crisis arises.

On 23 May 2005 — four months and nine days after Atlantic Storm — the 58th World Health Assembly in Geneva adopted the revised International Health Regulations (IHR 2005). It was the first major revision of the regulations since 1969. The central innovation: Article 12 IHR 2005 empowered the WHO Director-General, for the first time, to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) — that is, to declare an emergency unilaterally, without member-state consent, with immediate recommendations to all contracting states. That was the emergency-power architecture whose absence Atlantic Storm had diagnosed four months earlier.

The IHR revision had been in preparation for over a decade — the first impulse came from WHA Resolution 48.7 (1995), and negotiations had been running since 2000. Atlantic Storm did not invent the revision. But Atlantic Storm produced an escalation format in which political elites rehearsed the wording of the new emergency powers four months before the vote. Whoever played Atlantic Storm was mentally prepared for the IHR-2005 mechanism before voting on it as a member-state representative.

Brundtland, who played WHO DG in the exercise, had as the real WHO DG until 2003 led the negotiations. In the exercise she returned to a role whose mandate-expansion she had personally driven for years. An exercise as dress rehearsal of a mandate architecture about to be passed in Geneva.

What the Players Became Afterwards
#

The transatlantic political elite trained at Atlantic Storm reappeared, in the twelve years that followed, in the real-world coordination bodies whose need the exercise had diagnosed.

  • Bernard Kouchner became, under Sarkozy in 2007, France’s Foreign Minister. In Atlantic Storm he had played the figure arguing for a humanitarian-intervention doctrine in the emergency case — as real Foreign Minister 2007–2010 he pushed the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine in France’s UN policy, including the groundwork for the 2011 Libya intervention.
  • Werner Hoyer returned in 2009–2011 as Minister of State at the Foreign Office under Westerwelle and from 2012 became President of the European Investment Bank (EIB). He led the EIB for twelve years — including the COVID period, in which the EIB issued “Pandemic Bonds” and mobilised several billion euros in pandemic investment.
  • Jerzy Buzek became in 2009 President of the European Parliament (until 2012). He led the Parliament during the period in which EU pandemic early-warning mechanisms were institutionally expanded.
  • Jan Eliasson became in 2012 Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations under Ban Ki-moon. He was responsible, within the UN, for the coordination between the UN Secretariat and the WHO.
  • Madeleine Albright remained a Democratic foreign-policy figurehead and became sponsor of various health-security initiatives, including the Albright Stonebridge Group’s pharmaceutical-industry advisory mandate.

Six of the ten role-players occupied, in the years that followed, real key positions in the transatlantic coordination apparatus whose necessity Atlantic Storm had argued in 2005. The exercise was, for them, no academic simulation. It was the rehearsal of the function they would step into.

The Bridge to the Series
#

A reader who places the Atlantic Storm after-action report alongside Dark Winter’s sees the same mechanism in two escalation steps.

Dark Winter (2001) trained the executive class — officials, intelligence directors, reporters — on a US-internal bioterror attack. The recommendations were translated into US law from 2001 to 2008: Project BioShield, BARDA, Strategic National Stockpile, the DHS Science & Technology Directorate. The designers became contractors to and heads of those structures.

Atlantic Storm (2005) escalated the format to the political class — heads of government, WHO DG — and to a transatlantic crisis. The recommendations were passed four months later as WHO IHR 2005 in Geneva, and the players moved over the following twelve years into the transatlantic key positions that executed the new mandate architecture.

Both exercises were public. Both had the same designers (O’Toole, Inglesby). Both were Sloan-funded. Both used smallpox as the pathogen. But between 2001 and 2005 the format had differentiated: from a national officials’ tabletop to a transatlantic politicians’ exercise with immediate policy follow-on.

What followed in 2017 (SPARS), 2018 (Clade X) and 2019 (Event 201) was the next differentiation — by then no longer smallpox but coronavirus, and no longer just political class but pharma and media corporations as well (Event 201 had NBCUniversal, Johnson & Johnson, UPS at the table). Inglesby ran the JHU side of Event 201 in 2019. Sam Nunn served on the NTI board until 2017, when Joan Rohlfing took over. The personnel line ran on.

Closing
#

To read Atlantic Storm as a “rigged game” misses the mechanism, again. The exercise was not the plan for a pandemic. It was the rehearsal of a mandate architecture that was passed shortly afterwards — and the players moved over the next years into the positions that executed that architecture.

The dress rehearsal was not preparation for the apparatus; it was ratification rehearsal of the apparatus, four months before the formal ratification. Whoever, on 14 January 2005 in Washington, played out the smallpox response as “French Prime Minister” sat two years later as the real French Foreign Minister at tables where droit d’ingérence application was actually being decided. Whoever played “WHO Director-General” issuing emergency recommendations whose mandate basis did not yet exist had been driving that mandate-expansion inside the WHO bureaucracy itself for ten years. The Geneva WHA vote in May 2005 was the documentary closing of what had been performatively rehearsed in January 2005 in Washington.

Accountability of pandemic policy does not begin with the tabletops as a “proof collection” — it begins with the question how a public exercise with ten heads of government in Washington became, four months later, the emergency power of an international bureaucrat in Geneva. That is not a conspiracy. That is mandate architecture by tabletop.

The list of the players is the list of those who knew what they were signing.


Sources
#

Cross-references on related actors:

Pandemic Politics - This article is part of a series.
Part : This Article

Related

Dark Winter, June 2001: Those Who Rehearsed the Smallpox Built the Apparatus After

From 22 to 23 June 2001 — three months before 9/11, five months before the anthrax letters — thirteen former senior US officials sat at an oval table in a briefing room at Andrews Air Force Base near Washington and played thirteen days of a smallpox outbreak in thirteen hours. The exercise was called Dark Winter.

Clade X, May 2018: The Designer Becomes Player — and the Exercise Goes Live

On 15 May 2018, in the conference hall of the Mandarin Oriental Hotel in Washington, ten former or sitting US senior politicians and senior public-health officials gathered. 150 invited guests watched. A live stream ran simultaneously on Facebook. The exercise was called Clade X, lasted a single day and ended with a fictional outcome of 900 million dead worldwide over eighteen months. Convener: Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.

Event 201, October 2019: The Final Synchronisation — Pharma, China, Edelman, NBC, Henry Schein and the CIA at One Table

On 18 October 2019, in a conference hall at the Pierre Hotel on Fifth Avenue in New York, fifteen people gathered around an oval table. The seating chart, viewed from a distance, looks like a list of the world industries that would become central to a pandemic response. Four hours later, the fictional crisis cell had played out a coronavirus outbreak that, over eighteen months, produced 65 million dead and disrupted supply chains, the travel industry, vaccine procurement, and crisis communications across the entire globe.

SPARS 2017: How a Coronavirus Communications Script Drafted the Counter-Misinformation Architecture Two Years Before COVID

In October 2017 — two years and three months before the first documented COVID case in Wuhan — the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security published an 89-page document: “The SPARS Pandemic, 2025–2028: A Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators.” It was not a tabletop, not an NSC script like Dark Winter, not a transatlantic political format like Atlantic Storm. It was training material for press offices, PR professionals, risk communicators and agency spokespersons — a pre-written scenario meant to be read, not played.

The Stephan Kohn Case: Two BMI Papers, One Accountability Test, One Inquiry That Gave Its Own Answer

In spring 2020 the German Federal Ministry of the Interior produced two documents which together document the German application of the tabletop language-regulation architecture. Six years later the two papers meet again — as witness and as questioned, in the great hearing room of the German Bundestag, in the framework of the federal inquiry commission “Aufarbeitung der COVID-19-Pandemie.” What happens there is not accountability. It is a second application of the same mechanism.